Data Lakehouse Formats: Delta vs Iceberg vs Hudi

Delta Lake vs. Iceberg vs. Hudi

/tldr: Comparing the three leading open-source table formats that define the Data Lakehouse architecture.

ACID Transactions Schema Evolution Time Travel Upserts/Deletes

1. The Lakehouse Layer (Metadata & Transactions)

These formats transform raw files (like Parquet) in a cloud storage layer (Data Lake) into transactional, queryable tables. They achieve this by adding a **transaction log** or **metadata layer** that tracks exactly which physical files belong to a specific table version at any point in time.

Delta Lake

Pioneered by Databricks. Focused on simplicity, ease of use with Apache Spark, and performance optimization (Z-Ordering, Liquid Clustering). Uses a transaction log (JSON/Parquet) for all operations.

Apache Iceberg

Pioneered by Netflix. Focused on correctness, cross-engine compatibility (Spark, Flink, Trino, Snowflake), and eliminating data partitioning pitfalls. Uses a tiered metadata structure (Snapshot > Manifest List > Manifest).

Apache Hudi

Pioneered by Uber. Focused on efficient record-level updates and change data capture (CDC), acting as a data warehouse layer for streaming ingest. Offers built-in indexing features.

2. Feature Comparison Matrix

Feature Delta Lake Apache Iceberg Apache Hudi
ACID Transactions Yes (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) using a global transaction log. Yes. Snapshots provide transaction isolation. Yes, via optimistic concurrency control (OCC).
Schema Evolution Excellent (Add, Drop, Rename columns) with automated schema enforcement. Excellent. Supports column renames, reorders, and promotes schema correctness. Good. Supports backward-compatible schema changes.
Time Travel / Versioning Yes. Query by timestamp or version number via the transaction log. Yes. Query by snapshot ID or time travel pointer. Highly efficient due to metadata structure. Yes. Query based on commit time or incremental queries.
Upsert & Merge Strategy **Copy-on-Write (CoW)**: Rewrite entire files containing changed records. Low query latency, high write amplification. **Copy-on-Write (CoW)** is standard. **Merge-on-Read (MoR)** requires external tools or specific engine support (less native). **Copy-on-Write (CoW)** and **Merge-on-Read (MoR)** are both native and optimized. MoR offers low write amplification, but higher read latency.
Merge Performance (Updates) Requires rewriting files (CoW). Efficient for batch updates. Similar to Delta (CoW). Good, but not optimized for high-volume, continuous micro-updates. Best for fine-grained updates (MoR strategy mixes Parquet and Avro files) ideal for CDC/streaming use cases.
Partition Evolution Limited. Changing partition layout requires rewriting data. **Excellent.** Can change partition strategy (e.g., from day to hour) without rewriting old data files. Good, but changes usually require table restructuring.
Engine Compatibility Strong with Spark, but less portable historically. Growing support for Flink, Trino, etc. **Widest Compatibility.** Highly compatible across Spark, Flink, Trino, Presto, Impala, and Snowflake. Strong with Spark and Flink. Good compatibility with major SQL engines.

3. When to Choose Which Format

Choose Delta Lake If:

  • You are primarily using **Databricks/Apache Spark**.
  • You prioritize a simple, centralized architecture and easy setup.
  • Your updates are typically in large, manageable batches (CoW is acceptable).

Choose Apache Iceberg If:

  • You need **maximum engine compatibility** (e.g., querying from Spark, Flink, and Trino simultaneously).
  • You want to future-proof your data layout (excellent Partition Evolution).
  • You prioritize strict correctness and eliminating classic Hadoop partitioning pitfalls.

Choose Apache Hudi If:

  • Your core requirement is **record-level update/delete performance** (CDC/streaming ETL).
  • You need the flexibility of choosing between Copy-on-Write and Merge-on-Read natively.
  • You are migrating from a streaming data pipeline with frequent small updates.

All three formats deliver ACID properties, but they differ significantly in their metadata handling, compatibility, and optimization for updates/merges.

Data Engineering Fundamentals: Lakehouse Formats